| Niyamam AI

Displaying 18421 - 18425 of 21904

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Kappattakath Puthiyanalakath Musthafa vs Kappattakath Puthiya Nalakath Ayoob et al regarding Injunction

Injunction

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 197 OF 2014

2019-03-27

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Kunhimarakkar. C.P vs Abdul Rahiman regarding execution of decree.

Execution Petition

EP 225/2018

Malappuram

2019-03-27

0 years, 5 months, 22 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Canara Bank vs Shahul Hameed regarding money.

Civil Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 364 OF 2017

2019-03-22

Dismissed

View Full Details

Case between Chekath Pathumma et al vs Muhammedkutty et al regarding decree execution

Execution Petition

EP 209/2016

Tirur, Malappuram

2019-03-28

2 years, 6 months, 19 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Secretary vs Sivadasan Chakkanth et al regarding decree enforcement.

Injunction

EP 344/2018

Malappuram

2019-03-29

0 years, 3 months, 10 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9650

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

32%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment

Plaintiffs failed to pay required fees or batta, leading to case dismissal for default.

Found in 32 cases (32%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Insufficient evidence regarding means or merits resulted in the dismissal of many cases.

Found in 26 cases (26%) Medium Impact

Absence of Plaintiff in Court

Dismissals occurred frequently due to the absence of plaintiffs during hearings.

Found in 24 cases (24%) Medium Impact

Failure to Take Necessary Steps

Plaintiffs did not initiate required actions, like issuing notices, resulting in case dismissal.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment

Lack of Evidence Presented

Absence of Plaintiff in Court

Failure to Take Necessary Steps

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?