Case Summary
Kunhimarakkar. C.P is the decree holder, and Abdul Rahiman is the judgment debtor. The court addressed the execution petition and ordered the delivery effect.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Execution Petition
Final Judgment
No
The petition for execution was presented and the delivery was effected. The execution petition stands closed.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The execution petition was properly represented and the delivery was executed as ordered.
The execution petition was properly represented and the delivery was executed as ordered.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The execution petition was properly represented and the delivery was executed as ordered.
The execution petition was properly represented and the delivery was executed as ordered.
Supporting Evidence
The execution petition was properly represented and the delivery was executed as ordered.
Judgment Evidence:
Delivery effected. Recorded EP stands closed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Kunhimarakkar. C.P
- Party Age
- 49
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Abdul Rahiman
- Party Age
- 67
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Suresh A Alingal
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Execution Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
EP
Case Code Year
2018