Case Summary
The case involves a decree holder, Kunhipathumma, along with two others, against the judgment debtor, Hyder. The execution petition was dismissed as not pressed.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Execution Petition
Final Judgment
No
The execution petition filed by the decree holder was dismissed as not pressed.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
EP is dismissed as not pressed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Kunhipathumma
- Party Age
- 47
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Faizal
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Habeeb
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Hyder
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Vipin K
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
EP is dismissed as not pressed.
Evidence:
EP is dismissed as not pressed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Execution Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
EP
Case Code Year
2016