| Niyamam AI

Displaying 18006 - 18010 of 21904

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Secretary vs Sreekumar Choppan veettil et al regarding Execution Petition

Execution Petition

EP 368/2018

Malappuram

2019-09-28

0 years, 9 months, 9 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Kavungaparambil Ashraf vs Kavungaparambil Moideenkutty's children regarding cancellation of documents.

Civil Suit

Original Suit No. 251 OF 2017

2019-09-28

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Ramanalukkal Abdul Shareef vs Ramanalukkal Sidhikh regarding specific performance of contract.

Civil Suit

Original Suit No. 56 OF 2019

Tirur Taluk

2019-09-28

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Haneefa vs Mammu et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 393 OF 2005

Tirur

2019-09-28

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Chandran vs K.Sethudamadhavan regarding Restor.Ptn.

Restor.Ptn.

KLML130000652019

Malappuram

2019-09-28

0 years, 8 months, 10 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9650

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

24%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Multiple cases dismissed because plaintiffs failed to pay mandatory batta fees required for processing petitions.

Found in 24 cases (24%) High Impact

Lack of Necessary Documentation

Plaintiffs frequently failed to present essential documents, leading to case dismissals due to insufficient evidence.

Found in 22 cases (22%) High Impact

Failure to Issue Notice to Respondents

Dismissing petitions for plaintiffs' inability to properly issue notices to all necessary parties involved in the case.

Found in 17 cases (17%) Medium Impact

Absence of Plaintiffs in Court

Many cases dismissed due to the plaintiffs' no-shows in court, demonstrating lack of engagement in their proceedings.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Necessary Documentation

Failure to Issue Notice to Respondents

Absence of Plaintiffs in Court

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?