Case Summary
The case involves a petition filed by Chandran against K.Sethudamadhavan concerning restoration. The petition was registered mistakenly and subsequently removed from the registration list.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Restor.Ptn.
Final Judgment
No
The petition was found to be mistakenly registered and has been removed from the registration list.
Key Reasoning:
The court determined that the petition was mistakenly registered.
The court determined that the petition was mistakenly registered.
Why Defendant Won:
The court determined that the petition was mistakenly registered.
The court determined that the petition was mistakenly registered.
Supporting Evidence
The court determined that the petition was mistakenly registered.
Judgment Evidence:
This petition was mistakenly registered. This may be called along with RP. No. 79/2019. Hence removed from the registration list.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Chandran
- Party Age
- 1
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- K.Sethudamadhavan
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- E. M. Purushothaman
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Restor.Ptn.
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Chandran vs K.Sethudamadhavan regarding Restor.Ptn.
Case Code Year
Case between Chandran vs K.Sethudamadhavan regarding Restor.Ptn.