| Niyamam AI

Displaying 17516 - 17520 of 21904

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between M/s. Transformers and Electrical Industries vs M/s. Autonica India regarding rejection of suit.

Civil Suit

O. S. No.318/2023

Perumbavoor, Ernakulam, Kerala

2025-10-10

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Subramanian vs Santha et al regarding balance court fee and suit rejection.

Civil Suit

O. S. No.309/2019

Perumbavoor, Ernakulam District

2025-10-13

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between St. George Chits (Karakkattu) Pvt. Ltd. vs Babu Mathai et al regarding execution petition

Execution Petition

E.P. No. 92/2023

Perumbavoor

2025-10-13

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Sreevidya Sunilkumar vs Sunilkumar M. R. regarding property use

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 231/2025

2025-10-10

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Kootupuram Mahavishnukhethra Sevasamithi vs Commissioner, Thiruvithamkoor Devaswam Board Office regarding dismissal for default.

Civil Suit

OS.42/2020

2025-10-13

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9650

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

34%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment

Plaintiffs frequently failed to pay court fees or batta, leading to dismissal of their petitions.

Found in 34 cases (34%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Petitioners often did not provide sufficient evidence to support their claims, resulting in case dismissal.

Found in 25 cases (25%) Medium Impact

Absence of Petitioners in Court

Several cases were dismissed due to the petitioners' failure to appear at court hearings.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

Failure to Take Required Steps

Petitioners often failed to take necessary procedural steps, like issuing notices, leading to dismissals.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment

Lack of Evidence Presented

Absence of Petitioners in Court

Failure to Take Required Steps

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?