Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O. S. No.309/2019

Case between Subramanian vs Santha et al regarding balance court fee and suit rejection.

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Judge
Smt. Sumey Chandran
Order Date
2025-10-13
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Subramanian filed a suit against Santha and others regarding an issue related to balance court fees. The court rejected the suit due to non-remittance of the balance court fee.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was rejected due to the failure to remit the balance court fee. The court emphasized adherence to procedural rules.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The suit was rejected based on non-remittance of the required court fee.

Judgment Evidence:

Balance Court Fee not remitted. Suit rejected U/o. 7, Rule 11 of C.P.C.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Subramanian (50 years years) Vazhappilly House, Aimury Kara, Koovappady Village, Kunnathunadu Taluk, Ernakulam District

Defendants

Santha (47 years years) Karakkattuparambil House, Puttumanoor Kara, Puthancruz Village, Ernakulam District Latha (45 years years) Vazhappilly House, Akanadu Kara, Koovappady Village, Kunnathunadu Taluk, Ernakulam District Achuthan (24 years years) Vazhappilly House, Akanadu Kara, Koovappady Village, Kunnathunadu Taluk, Ernakulam District Appu (23 years years) Vazhappilly House, Akanadu Kara, Koovappady Village, Kunnathunadu Taluk, Ernakulam District Ani (23 years years) Vazhappilly House, Akanadu Kara, Koovappady Village, Kunnathunadu Taluk, Ernakulam District

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
Balance Court Fee not remitted.
Evidence:
Balance Court Fee not remitted. Suit rejected U/o. 7, Rule 11 of C.P.C.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Perumbavoor, Ernakulam District
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases