| Niyamam AI

Displaying 16931 - 16935 of 22128

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Mrs: Betsy Prasant et al vs Mr. Dinoj M.R. regarding compliance of rent control order

Rent Control Petition

R.C.P. No. 02/2022

Ernakulam

2025-09-12

approximately-2 years 9 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Suresh M P et al vs K K Lakshmanan et al regarding default dismissal of suit

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 679/2023

Ernakulam

2025-09-15

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Westgate Terrace Owners Association et al vs Dileep Rahulan regarding recovery of dues

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 1115 /2024

Ernakulam

2025-09-15

approximately-1 year 38 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Amrith Abey Mathew et al vs Sindhu K Bhaskaran regarding mediation terms

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 566/2024

Ernakulam

2025-09-15

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between BCG Golden Orchids II Owners Association vs Anu M.S regarding dismissal of suit

Civil Suit

O.S No. 191/2022

Ernakulam

2025-09-15

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9760

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

31%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Cases often dismissed for failure to pay required court fees, leading to defaults in petitions.

Found in 31 cases (31%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Submitted

Plaintiffs frequently failed to provide sufficient evidence to prove claims or respond effectively to defendants.

Found in 25 cases (25%) High Impact

Failure to Take Necessary Steps

Multiple cases were dismissed due to plaintiffs not taking required procedural steps, such as issuing notices.

Found in 22 cases (22%) Medium Impact

Absence of the Petitioner

Petitions often dismissed due to the absence of the plaintiff or petitioner's representation in court.

Found in 17 cases (17%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Submitted

Failure to Take Necessary Steps

Absence of the Petitioner

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?