Case Summary
The plaintiffs, Suresh M P, Rajesh Kumar M P, and Manju C P, filed a suit against the defendants K K Lakshmanan and Thankamani. The court dismissed the case for default as the plaintiffs were absent and did not intend to proceed.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The case was dismissed for default due to the absence of the plaintiffs. All interim orders related to the case are vacated.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiffs' absence indicated their intention not to proceed with the suit.
The plaintiffs' absence indicated their intention not to proceed with the suit.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiffs' absence indicated their intention not to proceed with the suit.
The plaintiffs' absence indicated their intention not to proceed with the suit.
Supporting Evidence
The court noted that the plaintiffs were absent and did not file any proof affidavit.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence suit is dismissed for default. All interim orders shall stand vacated.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Suresh M P
- Party Age
- 52
- Relation
- S/o Late Purushothaman
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Rajesh Kumar M P
- Party Age
- 47
- Relation
- S/o Late Purushothaman
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Manju C P
- Party Age
- 40
- Relation
- D/o Purushothaman
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- K K Lakshmanan
- Party Age
- 88
- Relation
- S/o Late Kuttappan
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Thankamani
- Party Age
- 80
- Relation
- D/o Kuttappan
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- N C Joseph
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- M P Rexy
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Bijoy K V
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- P S Sajith
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Plaintiff does not intend to proceed with suit.
Evidence:
Plaintiff absent no representation. Defendant represented. Plaintiff absent. No proof affidavit seen filed. Listed matter. Satisfied that plaintiff does not intend to proceed with suit. Hence suit is dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Suresh M P et al vs K K Lakshmanan et al regarding default dismissal of suit
Case Code Year
Case between Suresh M P et al vs K K Lakshmanan et al regarding default dismissal of suit