Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No. 566/2024

Case between Amrith Abey Mathew et al vs Sindhu K Bhaskaran regarding mediation terms

Court
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2025-09-15
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, Amrith Abey Mathew and others, are involved in a suit against the defendant, Sindhu K Bhaskaran, regarding the enforcement of mediation terms. The court found the terms of mediation lawful and incorporated them into the decree.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court determined that the mediation terms were lawful and closed the case incorporating these terms into the decree.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Court Fee shall be refunded.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The mediation terms reported were found lawful and complied with.

Judgment Evidence:

Closed in terms of Mediation incorporating terms of Mediation as part of decree.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Amrith Abey Mathew (25 years) 2417 - A, Shelter, Pallissery Road, Palarivattom, Ernakulam – 682 025. Sarathkumar P.G (25 years) Pulickakudiyil, Aimury P.O, East Aimury, Perumbavoor, Ernakulam - 683 544. Aslam Noushad (25 years) Kanupuram House, Iringol P.O, Perumbavoor, Ernakulam – 683 545.

Defendants

Sindhu K Bhaskaran (66 years) Sindhoor Golf Link Road, Chevayur, Kozhikode.

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Closed in terms of Mediation incorporating terms of Mediation as part of decree.
Evidence:
Terms of mediation found lawful.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases