| Niyamam AI

Displaying 1196 - 1200 of 21892

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Canara Bank vs Arjun Binoy et al regarding realization of money

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 664/2022

Kottayam

2025-09-23

approximately-2 years 11 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Bhavani V.R. vs Rajan P S regarding Restoration Petition

Restoration Petition

Restor.Ptn 300139/2024

Kottayam

2025-09-24

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Reethamma vs Ramani et al regarding restoration

Restoration Petition

Restor.Ptn 300086/2024

Kottayam

2025-09-23

Unknown

View Full Details

Case between Self Employers Service Society vs Poroskhan @ Firoskhan et al regarding realization of money.

Civil Suit

O.S No. 654/2021

Kottayam District

2025-09-23

approximately-4 years 10 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Hafeez vs Jyothi Jayakumar et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed.

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 122/2024

KOTTAYAM

2025-09-23

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9643

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

22%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiff failed to pay required batta fees, leading to dismissal of the case.

Found in 22 cases (22%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Plaintiff did not provide necessary evidence to support their claims or prove financial means.

Found in 20 cases (20%) High Impact

No Steps Taken in Case

Plaintiff failed to take required procedural steps, leading to case dismissal.

Found in 19 cases (19%) High Impact

Absence of Plaintiff

Case dismissed due to plaintiff's absence during hearings or proceedings.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Presented

No Steps Taken in Case

Absence of Plaintiff

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?