Case Summary
Hafeez is the plaintiff in this suit against Jyothi Jayakumar and others. The matter was settled and the plaintiff endorsed not pressing the suit.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed as not pressed following a settlement between the parties.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Hence suit is dismissed as not pressed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Hafeez
- Party Age
- 47
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Jyothi Jayakumar
- Party Age
- 43
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- S Dharmaraj
- Party Age
- 59
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- The South Indian Bank Ltd.
- Relation
- Represented by
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- P A Rabeez
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Anagha J
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Anie C Kuruvilla
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
The suit was dismissed as not pressed by the plaintiff.
Evidence:
Plaintiff endorsed not pressed on plaint. Hence suit is dismissed as not pressed.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Commission Report
Submitted By:
Court
Relevance:
The Commission Report was filed and discussed in court.
Reference:
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Hafeez vs Jyothi Jayakumar et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed.
Case Code Year
Case between Hafeez vs Jyothi Jayakumar et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed.