Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 664/2022

Case between Canara Bank vs Arjun Binoy et al regarding realization of money

Court
Court of the Munsiff, Kottayam
Judge
Smt. Indu. P. Raj
Order Date
2025-09-23
Duration
approximately-2 years 11 months
Case Closed
Tue, 09/23/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves Canara Bank, which granted an educational loan to Arjun Binoy and others. The defendants defaulted on the repayment, leading the bank to file a suit for the outstanding amount.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendants to pay the outstanding loan amount along with interest.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendants shall pay to the plaintiff the sum of Rs.4,59,681/- along with interest at the rate of 6% per annum.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendants to pay the outstanding loan amount along with interest.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The evidence provided by the plaintiff established the case without any rebuttal from the defendants.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The plaint averments, affidavit and the documents would establish the case of the plaintiff. There is no evidence to rebut the evidence adduced on the side of the plaintiff.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: It is ordered that the defendants shall pay to the plaintiff the sum of Rs.4,59,681/- (Rupees Four Lakhs Fifty Nine Thousand Six Hundred and Eighty one Only) along with interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of institution of the suit till the date of realization of the sum.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Canara Bank
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Arjun Binoy
Party Age
33
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Benoy Abraham
Party Age
66
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Abraham P M
Party Age
64
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Agreement Cum Deed of Hypothecation, Guarantee Agreement, Acknowledgment of Debt and security.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Priya R Chandran
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff sought recovery of the outstanding loan amount.
Evidence:
In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: It is ordered that the defendants shall pay to the plaintiff the sum of Rs.4,59,681/- along with interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of institution of the suit till the date of realization of the sum.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff sought recovery of costs from the defendants.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to realise the costs from the defendants.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Agreement cum deed of Hypothecation
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document establishes the hypothecation of the loan account.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Guarantee Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document outlines the guarantee agreement related to the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Acknowledgment of Debt and Security
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document reflects acknowledgment of the debt related to the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Acknowledgment of Debt and Security
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document reflects acknowledgment of the debt again related to the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Statement of Account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document contains the statement of the loan account showing the outstanding amount.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Copy of Lawyer’s notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document is a notice sent to the defendants regarding the loan default.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Postal Receipts
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Documents establish communication attempts with the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A7 Series
Document Type: Returned cover and Acknowledgment Cards
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Documents confirm reception of notices sent to the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A8 Series

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between Canara Bank vs Arjun Binoy et al regarding realization of money
Case Code Year
Case between Canara Bank vs Arjun Binoy et al regarding realization of money

Quick Facts

Location
Kottayam
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Case Filed
Fri, 09/23/2022 - 12:00
Case Closed
Tue, 09/23/2025 - 12:00
From
Fri, 08/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Tue, 09/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Canara Bank vs Sabitha K Sabu et al regarding recovery of money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between The South Indian Bank Ltd vs Dileep K Ponnappan et al regarding realization of money.
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Bank of Baroda vs Sooraj Soman regarding realisation of money
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Bank of India vs M/s. Sreelakshmi Kudumbasree et al regarding realization of money.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between State Bank of India vs Jayamohan.K regarding realisation of money.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won