| Niyamam AI

Displaying 266 - 270 of 15032

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Vijeesh Vijayan vs Cilvimol P regarding realisation of money.

Civil Suit

OS 89/2022

Vaikom Taluk, Kottayam District

2025-08-23

approximately-3 years 7 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Mathew C.M. vs Subichan P.K. regarding return of money advanced

Civil Suit

OS 31/2025

Vaikom

2025-08-22

approximately-2 years 3 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Vaikathappan Nidhi Limited vs Anju.S et al regarding realisation of money.

Civil Suit

O.S No.167/2024

Vaikom

2025-08-26

approximately-2 years 11 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Bharathy et al vs Shaju regarding declaration and injunction

Civil Suit

OS 76/2020

Vaikom, Kottayam

2025-08-27

approximately-5 years 2 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Binnu Thomas vs Sheebamol N.D regarding return of money.

Civil Suit

OS 37/2024

Vaikom

2025-08-27

approximately-1 year 10 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

39%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 15,022 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 4.2 years

Settlement Likelihood 14%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 574 cases)
Sale deed (in 480 cases)
Tax receipt (in 375 cases)
Land Tax Receipt (in 183 cases)
Death Certificate (in 182 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 5903
Defendant Won: 8099

8101

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

38%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Absent Plaintiff Representation

Plaintiffs frequently failed to appear, resulting in default dismissals of their cases.

Found in 38 cases (38%) High Impact

Non-Payment of Required Costs

Many cases were dismissed due to plaintiffs not paying necessary fees or costs as mandated by the court.

Found in 21 cases (21%) Medium Impact

Lack of Evidence Submitted

Plaintiffs often did not provide sufficient evidence to support their claims, leading to case dismissals.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

Failure to Issue Notice

Dismissals occurred because plaintiffs failed to issue required notices to defendants, lacking necessary procedures.

Found in 11 cases (11%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Absent Plaintiff Representation

Non-Payment of Required Costs

Lack of Evidence Submitted

Failure to Issue Notice

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?