| Niyamam AI

Displaying 2361 - 2365 of 15105

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Nadamel Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd. et al vs Sheeba Thambi regarding recovery of money

Civil Suit

O.S No. 1022/2023

Ernakulam District

2025-09-12

approximately-2 years

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Annie John et al vs Jamal regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 772/2025

Ernakulam District

2025-11-19

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Gopinathan K.R vs Ezhava Samajam Trust South Chittoor et al regarding temporary injunction

Injunction

O.S. No. 352/2025

Ernakulam

2025-11-17

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Vipin Kumar C V vs Jalaja Surendran, P N Surendran, Anandhu P S regarding temporary injunction

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 727/2025

Ernakulam

2025-11-15

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Karnan P. Paulson vs O.M. Nazeer et al regarding temporary injunction

Civil Suit

O.S No. 969/2025

Ernakulam

2025-11-15

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

39%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 15,022 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 4.2 years

Settlement Likelihood 14%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 574 cases)
Sale deed (in 480 cases)
Tax receipt (in 375 cases)
Land Tax Receipt (in 183 cases)
Death Certificate (in 182 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 5903
Defendant Won: 8099

8137

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

38%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Absence of Plaintiff

The court dismissed cases frequently due to the plaintiff's absence during proceedings.

Found in 38 cases (38%) High Impact

Failure to Produce Required Documents

Plaintiffs often could not provide necessary documents leading to the dismissal of their cases.

Found in 25 cases (25%) Medium Impact

Inaction and Lack of Representation

Cases were dismissed because plaintiffs failed to take action or had no legal representation.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

Failure to Pay Costs

Many petitions were dismissed due to the plaintiffs' failure to pay required court costs.

Found in 11 cases (11%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Absence of Plaintiff

Failure to Produce Required Documents

Inaction and Lack of Representation

Failure to Pay Costs

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?