Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 969/2025

Case between Karnan P. Paulson vs O.M. Nazeer et al regarding temporary injunction

Court
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2025-11-15
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Karnan P. Paulson, the plaintiff, seeks a temporary injunction against multiple defendants involved in unauthorized construction on a property he co-owns. The defendants argue that they have the right to construct a billboard without the plaintiff's consent.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court granted an order of interim injunction in favor of the plaintiff, preventing the defendants from constructing without his consent. This decision was based on the absence of a valid license and the shared ownership of the property.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Temporary injunction against construction without consent
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court granted an order of interim injunction in favor of the plaintiff, preventing the defendants from constructing without his consent. This decision was based on the absence of a valid license and the shared ownership of the property.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found that the plaintiff had a prima facie case, balance of convenience, and possibility of irreparable injury due to unauthorized construction.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court found that the plaintiff had a prima facie case, balance of convenience, and possibility of irreparable injury due to unauthorized construction.
Supporting Evidence
In view of these decisions, in the facts of the case, the contention that the proper course of remedy available to the plaintiff was to have filed suit for partition and not one for injunction, in the facts of the case, is devoid of merits.

Judgment Evidence:

An order of interim injunction is passed as follows: The respondents, their men and agents are restrained by an order of temporary injunction from making any construction in the injunction schedule property without the consent of the petitioner till disposal of suit.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Karnan P. Paulson
Party Age
36
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
O.M. Nazeer
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ragendu Nadesh
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Jibi Abraham
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Story board Media Private Limited
Relation
represented by its Director Joseph Sheldin
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mrs. V.M Usha Kumari
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Copy of Sale Deed No. 154/2022
Defendants Documents
Acknowledgment issued by Kalamassery Municipality, Copy of Agreement

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
P. Fazil
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Jithin Paul Varghese
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Fadil Fazil
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Aswathy Jayachandran
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Akshaya Thomas
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Rajeshkumar T.K
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Jijo Jose
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Temporary Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The court granted a temporary injunction against the respondents from making any construction on the injunction schedule property without the consent of the petitioner.
Evidence:
An order of interim injunction is passed as follows: The respondents, their men and agents are restrained by an order of temporary injunction from making any construction in the injunction schedule property without the consent of the petitioner till disposal of suit.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is referred to as proof of the plaintiff's purchase of the plaint A schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Acknowledgment
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
This document is presented by the defendants to show their application for a license to construct a billboard.
Reference:
Ext.B1
Document Type: Agreement
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
This document is referred to in relation to the agreement between the defendants regarding the construction of the billboard.
Reference:
Ext.B2
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
This report is mentioned as evidence considered for the petition.
Reference:
Ext.C1

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Karnan P. Paulson vs O.M. Nazeer et al regarding temporary injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Karnan P. Paulson vs O.M. Nazeer et al regarding temporary injunction

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sat, 11/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 11/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won