| Niyamam AI

Displaying 12216 - 12220 of 15105

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Infant Jesus Church represented by Fr. Deglus Pinheiro @ Douglas vs Peer Mohammed Khan regarding E.P.

Enforcement Proceedings

O.S No. 894/2018

Ernakulam

2025-09-12

approximately-7 years 10 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Shyla Joy et al vs Sabu T F regarding rent control petition

Rent Control Petition

R.C.P. No. 158/2024

Ernakulam

2025-09-11

approximately-2 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between John Lopez et al vs Treasa Lopez regarding recalling DW1.

Civil Suit

O.S No. 70/2020

Ernakulam

2025-09-11

approximately-5 years 2 months

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Mahesh M. vs Gely George regarding Rent Control

Rent Control

R.C.P. No. 75/2024

Ernakulam

2025-10-22

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Suresh M P et al vs K K Lakshmanan et al regarding default dismissal of suit

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 679/2023

Ernakulam

2025-09-15

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

39%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 15,022 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 4.2 years

Settlement Likelihood 14%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 574 cases)
Sale deed (in 480 cases)
Tax receipt (in 375 cases)
Land Tax Receipt (in 183 cases)
Death Certificate (in 182 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 5903
Defendant Won: 8099

8137

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

28%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Absence

Many plaintiffs failed as they were absent from court proceedings, leading to automatic dismissal of their petitions.

Found in 28 cases (28%) Medium Impact

Failure to Produce Evidence

Plaintiffs often did not present sufficient evidence, resulting in their claims being dismissed for lack of merit.

Found in 24 cases (24%) Medium Impact

Lack of Necessary Documentation

Numerous plaintiffs failed to provide required documents, leading to dismissals due to insufficient substantiation of their claims.

Found in 22 cases (22%) Medium Impact

Non-Payment of Costs

Many cases were dismissed because plaintiffs did not pay necessary court fees or costs as ordered by the court.

Found in 16 cases (16%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Absence

Failure to Produce Evidence

Lack of Necessary Documentation

Non-Payment of Costs

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?