Case Summary
Mahesh M. and Sini S. Krishnan are the petitioners seeking compliance of rent payment, while Gely George is the respondent who has defaulted on rent payments. The court found that the respondent failed to comply with previous orders about rental arrears.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Vacant possession of the building granted to the petitioner.
Case Type
Rent Control
Final Judgment
No
The court found that the respondent did not comply with the previous orders regarding rent payments. Consequently, the court ordered the stoppage of further proceedings and directed that the respondent give vacant possession to the petitioner.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The respondent failed to comply with the order of the court regarding rent arrears.
The respondent failed to comply with the order of the court regarding rent arrears.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The respondent did not comply with the order or shown any sufficient cause for non-compliance.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence an order is passed under Section 12(3) of the Act stopping all the further proceedings in the rent control petition and directing the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building forthwith.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Mahesh M.
- Party Age
- 47
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sini S. Krishnan
- Party Age
- 47
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Gely George
- Relation
- D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- H. Nujumudeen
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Antony Shyju
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Rekha M.M.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Philip T. Varghese
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Thomas T. Varghese
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Achu Shubha Abraham
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Nitya R.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Amala Purushothaman
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Rineesha Rajkumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Urmila M.G.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Maria Angel
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Possession
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The court ordered the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building forthwith.
Evidence:
Hence an order is passed under Section 12(3) of the Act stopping all the further proceedings in the rent control petition and directing the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building forthwith.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Rent Control
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Mahesh M. vs Gely George regarding Rent Control
Case Code Year
Case between Mahesh M. vs Gely George regarding Rent Control