| Niyamam AI

Displaying 321 - 325 of 597

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Radhakrishnan Nair vs Smt. Sreelatha regarding offence under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.

Criminal Case

ST.No. 107/2023

Kollam

2025-10-22

approximately-7 years 10 months

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Suseela. S vs Shajim Badisha et al regarding U/s. 138 N.I. Act

Criminal Case

S.T. No.134/2023

Kollam

2025-10-31

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Sindhu. S vs Deepak regarding offence punishable under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act

Criminal Case

ST.No. 154/2023

Kollam

2025-07-14

approximately-6 years 10 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Sindhu. S vs Deepak regarding Offence punishable under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.

Criminal Case

ST.No. 154/2023

Kollam

2025-07-14

approximately-5 years 5 months

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Mrs. Vyga. M.S. vs Mr.Deepak G. Krishnan et al regarding U/s. 138 N.I. Act.

Criminal Case

S.T. No.01/2020

KOLLAM

2025-07-29

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

37%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 594 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength Medium Impact

Average Case Duration 3.6 years

Settlement Likelihood 10%

Common Winning Factors:

Cheque (in 220 cases)
Postal receipt (in 136 cases)
Acknowledgment card (in 87 cases)
Cheque Return Memo (in 83 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 67 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 222
Defendant Won: 342

345

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

68%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Withdrawal of Complaint by Complainant

The majority of cases resulted in acquittal due to the complainant withdrawing the complaint altogether.

Found in 68 cases (68%) High Impact

Failure to Prove Transaction

Plaintiffs often failed to establish the necessary evidence of the financial transaction supporting their claims.

Found in 16 cases (16%) Medium Impact

Complainant's Absence in Court

Several cases saw the dismissal or acquittal due to the complainant's failure to appear in court to provide evidence.

Found in 10 cases (10%) Medium Impact

Insufficient Evidence Presented

Many cases led to acquittal due to the lack of sufficient evidence to prove the defendant's guilt.

Found in 6 cases (6%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Withdrawal of Complaint by Complainant

Failure to Prove Transaction

Complainant's Absence in Court

Insufficient Evidence Presented

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?