| Niyamam AI

Displaying 1481 - 1485 of 2451

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between State Bank of India vs Sri. Sajith K regarding realization of money

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 776/2024

Ernakulam

2025-03-24

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Union Bank of India vs Shyni K regarding realization of money

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 918 /2024

2025-03-25

approximately-7 years 10 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between UCO Bank vs M/s Elvakkattu Mills et al regarding recovery of money

Civil Suit

O.S No. 735/2023

Ernakulam

2025-03-26

approximately-5 years

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Bank of Baroda vs Bibin Moncy, Moncy T.U regarding recovery of money

Civil Suit

O.S No. 515/2024

Ernakulam

2025-03-26

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Bank of Baroda vs Sandhya Suresh regarding recovery of outstanding loan amount

Civil Suit

O.S No. 519/2024

2025-03-26

approximately-6 years 11 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

89%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 2,443 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.9 years

Settlement Likelihood 6%

Common Winning Factors:

Statement of Account (in 538 cases)
Loan Application (in 488 cases)
Postal receipt (in 435 cases)
Demand Promissory Note (in 354 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 290 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 2163
Defendant Won: 218

219

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

34%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Multiple petitions were dismissed for plaintiffs' failure to pay the required court fee known as batta.

Found in 34 cases (34%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence from Plaintiffs

Cases were dismissed due to plaintiffs failing to present required evidence or lack of proof of means.

Found in 28 cases (28%) Medium Impact

Absence of Plaintiff During Hearings

Numerous suits were dismissed because the plaintiff was absent or did not represent their case in court.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

Failure to Press the Suit

Suits were dismissed when plaintiffs or their counsel failed to press their case or appear.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence from Plaintiffs

Absence of Plaintiff During Hearings

Failure to Press the Suit

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?