Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 515/2024

Case between Bank of Baroda vs Bibin Moncy, Moncy T.U regarding recovery of money

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Nanda Krishna M.
Order Date
2025-03-26
Duration
Case Closed
Wed, 03/26/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Bank of Baroda, filed a suit against the defendants, Bibin Moncy and Moncy T.U, for recovery of an education loan amounting to ₹1,51,448.61 due to non-payment despite multiple requests. The court delivered a judgment in favor of the plaintiff.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit directing the defendants to pay the amount of ₹1,51,448.61 to the plaintiff with interest. The court allowed the claim for the principal due but limited the interest awarded.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendants ordered to pay ₹1,51,448.61 with interest
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit directing the defendants to pay the amount of ₹1,51,448.61 to the plaintiff with interest. The court allowed the claim for the principal due but limited the interest awarded.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The unchallenged proof affidavit and documents satisfied the court that the plaintiff's claim was valid.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The unchallenged proof affidavit and documents satisfied the court that the plaintiff's claim was valid.
Supporting Evidence
The unchallenged proof affidavit and documents would satisfactorily prove the plaint claim.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, The suit is decreed directing the defendant to pay an amount of 1,51,448.61/- (Rupees One Lakhs Fifty One Thousand Four Hundred and Forty Eight point Sixty one paise Only) with 9% interest per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Bank of Baroda
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Bibin Moncy
Party Age
29
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Moncy T.U
Party Age
53
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Sanction letter No. A1, Articles of agreement No. A2, Acknowledgment of liability No. A3, Acknowledgment of debt No. A4, Lawyer notice No. A5, Postal receipts, A/d card, Statement of account.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Santhosh G Prabhu
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Aswathy A
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Deepa N.U
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff's claim for recovery of ₹1,51,448.61 from the defendants.
Evidence:
The suit is decreed directing the defendant to pay an amount of 1,51,448.61/- (Rupees One Lakhs Fifty One Thousand Four Hundred and Forty Eight point Sixty one paise Only) with 9% interest per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled for the costs of the litigation.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is also entitled for the costs of the litigation.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Sanction letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Issued by the Plaintiff bank to the defendant as part of the loan agreement.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Articles of agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Executed by the defendants as security for the loan repayment.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Letter of acknowledgment of liability
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Acknowledged by the defendants confirming their liability.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Letter of acknowledgment of debt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Executed by the defendant acknowledging the debt.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Copy of the lawyer notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Issued to the defendants demanding payment.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Postal Receipts
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Two postal receipts related to the delivery of documents.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: A/d Card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Two A/d cards related to the communication with the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Statement of Account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Showing the loan account details of the first defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A8

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between Bank of Baroda vs Bibin Moncy, Moncy T.U regarding recovery of money
Case Code Year
Case between Bank of Baroda vs Bibin Moncy, Moncy T.U regarding recovery of money

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Mon, 07/11/2016 - 12:00
Case Closed
Wed, 03/26/2025 - 12:00
From
Sat, 03/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 03/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between M/s IDBI Bank vs Shri. Sajeeb V.S regarding realization of money
IN THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Bank of Baroda vs M/s M K S Agency, Sandhya Suresh regarding realization of money
Court of Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Dhanalaxmi Bank Limited vs Thaslim Nazrin V M et al regarding realization of money
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Mrs. Preethymol P.T regarding realization of money
Court of the Third Addl. Munsiff & Rent Controller, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Bank of Baroda represented by its Chief Manager, Manohar M vs Ratheesh P.S regarding recovery of money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won