Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S No. 519/2024

Case between Bank of Baroda vs Sandhya Suresh regarding recovery of outstanding loan amount

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Nanda Krishna M.
Order Date
2025-03-26
Duration
approximately-6 years 11 months

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Bank of Baroda, filed a suit against the defendant, Sandhya Suresh, to recover an outstanding loan amount due to default in repayment. Despite multiple requests, the defendant failed to clear the dues, leading to the plaintiff seeking legal recourse.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, directing the defendant to pay an amount of ₹2,40,824 with interest. The plaintiff is also entitled to recover the costs of litigation.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The defendant is directed to pay ₹2,40,824 with 9% interest per annum from the date of suit until the date of decree.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The unchallenged proof affidavit and documents satisfactorily proved the plaint claim.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, The suit is decreed directing the defendant to pay an amount of 2,40,824/- (Rupees Two Lakhs Forty thousand Eight hundred and Twenty Four Only) with 9% interest per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Bank of Baroda (Age not specified years) Kakkanad branch, represented by Chief Manager and duly authorized Power of Attorney Holder, Manohar M, 54 years, S/o K.P.Motilal, S.N.S.Samithi building, Ground floor, KINFRA road, Kakkanad P.O, Ernakulam – 682 030

Defendants

Sandhya Suresh (48 years years) Makayiram nivas, Pallikkara, Moonelumukal, Pazhamthottam P.O, Ernakulam, Pin – 683 565

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to recover ₹2,40,824 with interest.
Evidence:
The suit is decreed directing the defendant to pay an amount of 2,40,824/- (Rupees Two Lakhs Forty thousand Eight hundred and Twenty Four Only) with 9% interest per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to recover the full costs of the litigation.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is also entitled for the costs of the litigation.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Loan Application
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The document includes the loan application form submitted by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Letter of Sanction
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The document is the letter of sanction to the borrower acknowledged by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Demand Promissory Note
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The document evidences the demand promissory note executed by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Declaration Cum undertaking
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The document is the declaration cum undertaking cum authority executed by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Letter of Instalment with Acceleration Clause
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The document includes the letter of instalment with acceleration clause executed by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Letter of Acknowledgement of Debt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The document is the letter of acknowledgment of debt executed by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Copy of Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The document is a copy of lawyer notice along with postal receipts and acknowledgement card.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Statement of Account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The document is the statement of account of the loan transaction of the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A8

Quick Facts

Location
Case Filed
Fri, 04/05/2019 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases