| Niyamam AI

Displaying 1386 - 1390 of 2452

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between M/s Future Marketting Company vs Electro-Tech regarding money due

Civil Suit

O.S No. 1090/2024

2025-08-20

approximately-3 years 6 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between State Bank of India vs Edison Thomas, Lissy Martin regarding Suit for money.

Civil Suit

O.S No. 54/2025

Ernakulam

2025-08-20

approximately-11 years 11 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Pratheeksha Kuries and Investments Pvt Ltd. vs Joy P.P et al regarding realization of money due from the defendant to the Plaintiff in chit transaction.

Civil Suit

O.S No. 150/2023

Ernakulam

2025-08-20

approximately-2 years 6 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between N.M. Balakrishnan vs AHS Enterprises regarding realization of money.

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 336/2021

Ernakulam

2025-08-21

approximately-8 years 3 months

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Samanyu Sanathanan vs M/s Codea Technologies Pvt. Ltd. regarding realization of salary

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 915/2021

Ernakulam

2025-08-22

approximately-4 years 2 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

89%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 2,443 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.9 years

Settlement Likelihood 6%

Common Winning Factors:

Statement of Account (in 538 cases)
Loan Application (in 488 cases)
Postal receipt (in 435 cases)
Demand Promissory Note (in 354 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 290 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 2163
Defendant Won: 218

220

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

36%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Failure to Pay Fees or Batta

Plaintiffs frequently failed to remit required court fees or batta, leading to case dismissals.

Found in 36 cases (36%) High Impact

Absence of Plaintiff at Hearings

Many cases were dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence during scheduled court hearings or proceedings.

Found in 21 cases (21%) Medium Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Plaintiffs often failed to provide adequate evidence to support their claims, resulting in dismissed cases.

Found in 17 cases (17%) Medium Impact

Non-Representation by Plaintiffs

Cases were dismissed when plaintiffs did not have legal representation, affecting their ability to present their cases.

Found in 12 cases (12%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Failure to Pay Fees or Batta

Absence of Plaintiff at Hearings

Lack of Evidence Presented

Non-Representation by Plaintiffs

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?