Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S No. 54/2025

Case between State Bank of India vs Edison Thomas, Lissy Martin regarding Suit for money.

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Nanda Krishna M.
Order Date
2025-08-20
Duration
approximately-11 years 11 months

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The State Bank of India filed a suit against Edison Thomas and Lissy Martin for the recovery of an outstanding education loan amount. The defendants defaulted on the repayment of the loan, prompting the plaintiff to seek legal action to recover the dues.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, directing the defendants to pay the outstanding amount due with interest. The defendants failed to appear in court, leading to a decision in their absence.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendants to pay an amount of 3,26,274/- with 9% interest per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The unchallenged proof affidavit and documents submitted by the plaintiff satisfactorily proved the plaint claim.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, The suit is decreed directing the defendants to pay an amount of 3,26,274/- (Rupees Three lakhs Twenty Six Thousand and Two hundred Seventy Four only), with 9% interest per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

State Bank of India (Age not specified years) Centralized processing Centre -2, Panampilly Nagar, Ernakulam – 682036

Defendants

Edison Thomas (29 years) Kuttezhathu house, Thamarassery road, Maradu P.O, Pin – 682 304. Lissy Martin (55 years) Kuttezhathu house, Thamarassery road, Maradu P.O, Pin – 682 304.

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Request for recovery of the outstanding loan amount.
Evidence:
The suit is decreed directing the defendants to pay an amount of 3,26,274/- (Rupees Three lakhs Twenty Six Thousand and Two hundred Seventy Four only), with 9% interest per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Request for the costs of litigation.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is also entitled to the costs of the litigation.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Loan Application
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Documents related to the loan application submitted by the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Arrangement Letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document issued by the bank agreeing to arrange the educational loan.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Agreement for term loan under Education loan schemes
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Loan agreement signed by the defendants, outlining the repayment terms.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Copy of the lawyer notice issued to the defendants
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Legal notice served to the defendants demanding repayment of the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Acknowledgment card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Card confirming receipt of the legal notice by the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Certificate under Banker’s Book Evidence Act
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certificate confirming the bank records related to the defendants' loan.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Statement of Account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Statement showing the loan account details and repayment history.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Account Statement with correct interest application
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Final account statement reflecting the correct interest calculations.
Reference:
Ext.A8

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Tue, 09/02/2014 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases