Case Summary
Samanyu Sanathanan, the plaintiff, claims unpaid salary from M/s Codea Technologies Pvt. Ltd. and its director for the months of November and December 2020. Despite fulfilling his duties diligently, the plaintiff was denied his entitled salary, prompting him to seek legal recourse.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Rs.80,625 along with interest
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff provided sufficient evidence of employment and entitlement to salary.
The plaintiff provided sufficient evidence of employment and entitlement to salary.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, suit is decreed as follows: Defendants shall pay Rs.80,625/- along with interest on the principle amount of Rs.75,000/- @ 9% from the date of suit till the date of decree and 6% from the date of decree till payment or realization.
Parties Involved
Plaintiffs
Samanyu Sanathanan (31 years years)
Parvanendu Kalathil, Vidyodaya School, V K C P O, Thevakkal, Kochi 682 021
Defendants
M/s Codea Technologies Pvt. Ltd. (Age not specified years)
2nd Floor, Cafeteria Block, Athulya, Infopark, Kusumagiri, Kakkanad, Kochi 682 030
Jaison Jose Olikkal (Age not specified years)
2nd Floor, Cafeteria Block, Athulya, Infopark, Kusumagiri, Kakkanad, Kochi 682 030
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Recovery
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Plaintiff requested recovery of Rs.80,625/- as salary dues.
Evidence:
plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of Rs.80,625/- with interest on the principle amount of Rs.75,000/- @ 9% from the date of suit till the date of decree and 6% from the date of decree till the date of payment or realization.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Notarized Power of Attorney
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document served as a legal authority for the plaintiff to act on behalf of himself in the case.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type:
Order of Appointment
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document established the employment of the plaintiff by the first defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type:
Resignation Letter
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This letter documented the plaintiff's resignation from the defendant's company.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type:
Certificate under section 63 of Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam 2023
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This certificate verified a legal requirement related to the plaintiff's documents.
Reference:
Ext.A3(a)
Document Type:
Lawyer's Notice
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This notice demanded payment of the owed salary to the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type:
Postal receipt
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This receipt provided evidence that the lawyer's notice was sent to the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type:
Complaint to District Labour Officer
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document supported the plaintiff's claims regarding unpaid salary issues raised to authorities.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type:
Reply from District Labour Officer
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This reply indicated the outcome of the complaint made by the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type:
Complaint to Development Commissioner
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document reflected another effort by the plaintiff to resolve his salary dispute.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type:
Reply from Development Commissioner
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document documented the response from the Development Commissioner regarding the plaintiff's complaint.
Reference:
Ext.A9