Case Summary
Yunus filed a restoration petition due to a delay of 82 days seeking relief on paying a cost of Rs.3500.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Allowing the restoration petition on payment of cost
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the petition on payment of cost due to the delay in filing.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned.
Reason not clearly mentioned.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Reason not clearly mentioned.
Reason not clearly mentioned.
Supporting Evidence
No sufficient reason is offered. Since it is always desirable to have a disposal on merit.
Judgment Evidence:
Since it is always desirable to have a disposal on merit. I am inclined to allow this petition on payment of cost of Rs.3500/-. Cost paid IA allowed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Yunus
- Party Age
- 38
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Muhammad Shareef
Plaintiffs Documents
Not mentioned
Defendants Documents
Not mentioned
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Mehroof Shihab K
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Advocate for Muhammad Shareef
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Restoration
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Restoration of the petition allowed on payment of cost
Evidence:
Disposal is always desirable to have a disposition on merit.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Category
Case Restoration and Delays
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Delay in filing petition
Case Code
Case between Yunus vs Muhammad Shareef regarding restoration petition
Case Code Year
Case between Yunus vs Muhammad Shareef regarding restoration petition
Case Flags
Adalath Resolved