Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ST No.67/2023

Case between Vinoy Joseph vs Thomas Kuruvila regarding dishonour of cheque

Court
COURT OF THE JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE-II, PALA
Judge
Sri. Hasheem. S
Order Date
2025-09-12
Duration
approximately-5 years 4 months
Case Closed
Fri, 09/12/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves Vinoy Joseph, who filed a complaint against Thomas Kuruvila for dishonouring a cheque. The accused was found guilty of the offence under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The accused was convicted under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and sentenced to one year of simple imprisonment and a fine of ₹5,00,000.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The accused is sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for one year and to pay a fine of ₹5,00,000.
Case Type
Criminal Case
Final Judgment
No
The accused was convicted under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and sentenced to one year of simple imprisonment and a fine of ₹5,00,000.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The complainant established that the cheque issued was for a legally enforceable debt, and all statutory requirements were complied with.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The complainant established that the cheque issued was for a legally enforceable debt, and all statutory requirements were complied with.
Supporting Evidence
The accused issued Ext.P1 cheque to the complainant for discharging a legally enforceable debt of ₹5,00,000/- (Rupees Five Lakhs Only).

Judgment Evidence:

In view of the above discussion, it can be safely concluded that the available evidence on records is sufficient to establish beyond all reasonable doubt that the accused had executed and issued Ext.P1 cheque to PW1 for the discharge of a legally enforceable debt, and the defence could not rebut the presumption.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Vinoy Joseph
Party Age
50
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Thomas Kuruvila
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Cheque No.497478, Cheque return memo, Legal notice, Postal receipt, Account statement.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Joshy Abraham
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Jacob D Nellikappally
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The accused was convicted and sentenced to imprisonment and fined.
Evidence:
The accused is convicted under section 255(2) of the Cr.PC for offence under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, and he is sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for one year and to pay a fine of ₹5,00,000/-(Rupees Five Lakh Only) with interest @6% per annum from the date of the judgment.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Cheque
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The cheque issued by the accused was used to demonstrate the debtor-creditor relationship.
Reference:
Ext.P1
Document Type: Cheque Return Memo
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was presented to show that the cheque was dishonoured due to insufficient funds.
Reference:
Ext.P2
Document Type: Legal Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The legal notice is important as it was sent to the accused after the cheque was dishonoured.
Reference:
Ext.P3
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This receipt proves that the legal notice was sent to the accused.
Reference:
Ext.P4
Document Type: Certificate from Postal Department
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This certificate confirms that the legal notice was delivered to the accused.
Reference:
Ext.P5
Document Type: Account Statement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The account statement provides evidence of the loan transactions made by the complainant.
Reference:
Ext.P6
Document Type: Certified copy of Account statement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This certified copy supports the claim regarding the transactions made.
Reference:
Ext.P7

Case Classification

Case Type
Criminal Case
Category
Cheque Bounce Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Pala
Common Reasons
Cheque dishonour
Case Code
Case between Vinoy Joseph vs Thomas Kuruvila regarding dishonour of cheque
Case Code Year
Case between Vinoy Joseph vs Thomas Kuruvila regarding dishonour of cheque

Case Flags

Cheque-Related Case
Imprisonment Involved
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque Dishonour under Section 138 N.I. Act
Imprisonment Duration
One year

Quick Facts

Location
Pala
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Pala
Case Filed
Wed, 06/10/2020 - 12:00
Case Closed
Fri, 09/12/2025 - 12:00
From
Fri, 08/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 10/27/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Midhun Scaria vs George Joseph regarding Negotiable Instrument Act violation.
Court of the Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Pala
Criminal Case Plaintiff Won
Case between Balakrishnan vs Salim Thayyil regarding dishonor of cheque
COURT OF THE JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE-II PALA
Criminal Case Defendant Won
Case between Joby Jose vs Anju Prakash regarding withdrawal of complaint.
Judicial First Class Magistrate – II
Criminal Case Defendant Won
Case between Ragul K.R. vs Santha Suresh et al regarding U/s 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act.
COURT OF THE JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE - II
Criminal Case Defendant Won
Case between Mathew vs Justy Toms regarding Punishable U/s 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
IN THE COURT OF THE JUDL. Ist CLASS MAGISTRATE – II, PALA
Criminal Case Plaintiff Won