Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S 47/2015

Case between Vijayabhanu vs Suresh Babu regarding commission report and plan rectification

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Judge
Smitha Susan Mathew
Order Date
2025-04-10
Duration
approximately-9 years 18 days
Case Code No.
47
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves a petition by the defendant Vijayabhanu to return a plan and report prepared in another application to rectify defects. The plaintiff Suresh Babu objected to this petition.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The petition by the defendant to return the plan and report was allowed. The court set aside previous commission reports due to their unreliability and appointed new officials for a fresh report.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
A new report and plan is necessary to resolve the dispute.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The petition by the defendant to return the plan and report was allowed. The court set aside previous commission reports due to their unreliability and appointed new officials for a fresh report.
Key Reasoning:
The court found the previous commission reports unreliable due to various deficiencies in the plans and measurements.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The court is of the view that both commission reports and plans are to be set aside.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the petition is allowed. C1, C1(a) and C2, C2(a) are set aside.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Suresh Babu
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Vijayabhanu
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Alex J. Edackattu
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Harindramohan Nair C.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Court
Advocate Name
Riyas Bin Karim
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The petition to return the plan and report was allowed, and both commission reports were set aside.
Evidence:
In the result, the petition is allowed. C1, C1(a) and C2, C2(a) are set aside.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
The court reviewed and found these commission reports unreliable to resolve the dispute.
Reference:
C1, C1(a)
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
The court found this commission report unreliable and decided to set it aside.
Reference:
C2, C2(a)

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kanjirappally
Common Reasons
Case Code
O.S
Case Code Year
2015

Quick Facts

Location
Kanjirappally
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kanjirappally
Case Filed
Fri, 04/10/2015 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Sat, 03/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 04/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Abraham Mathew et al vs Suresh Raman et al regarding suit dismissal
Court of the Munsiff, Kanjirappally
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Union Bank of India vs Dhanya S., Silamban M. et al regarding non-payment of court fee.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Anilkumar vs Chirakkadavu Grama Panchayath regarding withdrawal of suit.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Joseph Antony et al vs C. M. M Educational and Charitable Trust regarding Interlocutory Application
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Anilkumar vs Chirakkadavu Grama Panchayat regarding withdrawal of suit.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won