Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 1143 / 2022

Case between Varkey Mathew @ K V Mathew vs Peter Mathew regarding realization of money

Court
Court of Munsiff, Ernakulam
Judge
Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany
Order Date
Duration
approximately-3 years 4 months
Case Closed
Sat, 08/23/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Varkey Mathew loaned Rs.5,00,000 to Peter Mathew, who then failed to repay it after the agreed period. The plaintiff alleges that the defendant has withheld the repayment, causing financial distress.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court found in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendant to pay Rs.5,35,000 including interest for the repayment of the loan.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendants shall pay Rs.5,35,000/- along with interest @ 12% from the date of suit till the date of decree.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court found in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendant to pay Rs.5,35,000 including interest for the repayment of the loan.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The evidence showed that the defendant borrowed Rs.5,00,000/- from the plaintiff and failed to repay.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The evidence showed that the defendant borrowed Rs.5,00,000/- from the plaintiff and failed to repay.
Supporting Evidence
Therefore, from the evidence on record, the court is satisfied that the plaintiff has proved his case and from Exhibit X1,...

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is decreed as follows: 1) Defendants shall pay Rs.5,35,000/- (Rupees Five lakhs thirty five thousand only) along with interest @ 12% from the date of suit till the date of decree and 6% from the date of decree till payment or realization, as the case may be, to the plaintiff.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Varkey Mathew @ K V Mathew
Party Age
62
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Peter Mathew
Party Age
62
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Bank attested copy of account statement in Account No: 423702010014622 of Union Bank of India, Ponnurunni
Defendants Documents
Bank attested copy of account statement from 01.11.21 to 10.04.22 of Account No: 12880100087213

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Madhu Abraham
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sanu S Malakeel
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Ram mohan L
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff sought recovery of Rs.5,00,000/- along with interest.
Evidence:
Hence issue no 1 is found in favour of plaintiff.
Relief Type: Declaration
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendants are liable to pay Rs.5,35,000/- along with interest and costs.
Evidence:
1) Defendants shall pay Rs.5,35,000/- (Rupees Five lakhs thirty five thousand only) along with interest @ 12 % from the date of suit till the date of decree and 6% from the date of decree till payment or realization.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Bank Account statement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Produced to show that the plaintiff had sufficient funds and to support his claim of lending Rs.5,00,000/- to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Bank Account statement
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Produced to support the defendant's contention about prior loans given to the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.B1
Document Type: Original account statement
Submitted By: Unknown
Relevance:
Marked to illustrate the transactions showing the transfer of Rs.5,00,000/- from the plaintiff to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.X1
Document Type: Cheque transaction
Submitted By: Unknown
Relevance:
Illustrates the specific cheque used for the transaction of Rs.5,00,000/-.
Reference:
Ext.X1(a)
Document Type: Bank Account statement
Submitted By: Unknown
Relevance:
Marked to show the defendant's financial activities, but not evidencing a loan to the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.X2
Document Type: Oral Evidence
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Plaintiff testified in accordance with his claims.
Reference:

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between Varkey Mathew @ K V Mathew vs Peter Mathew regarding realization of money
Case Code Year
Case between Varkey Mathew @ K V Mathew vs Peter Mathew regarding realization of money

Case Flags

Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque issued towards legally enforceable debt

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Sun, 03/20/2022 - 12:00
Case Closed
Sat, 08/23/2025 - 12:00
From
Fri, 08/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Canara Bank vs Mrs. Preethymol P.T regarding realization of money
Court of the Third Addl. Munsiff & Rent Controller, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Fr. Antony Chiriyankandath vs Sri. Mathew C.T. regarding realization of money
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Bank of Baroda represented by its Chief Manager, Manohar M vs Ratheesh P.S regarding recovery of money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Meera N B vs Vincy E J et al regarding realization of money
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s Transformers and Electrical Industries vs M/s Crystal Traders regarding realization of money
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won