Case Summary
Valsamma Tomy, the plaintiff, sought to reopen evidence and examine herself online due to being abroad. Biju Augustine, the defendant, opposed this request.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed both applications filed by the plaintiff seeking to reopen evidence and examine herself online.
Key Reasoning:
The court found no sufficient reason for the reopening of evidence.
The court found no sufficient reason for the reopening of evidence.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The petition does not show that the Power of Attorney had acted against the interests of plaintiff and as such plaintiff is to be examined.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, IA 08/2025 and IA 09/2025 is dismissed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Valsamma Tomy
- Party Age
- 68
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Haridas T.R.
- Party Age
- 66
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Biju Augustine
- Party Age
- 48
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Archana R. Pillai
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- D. Biju
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Refused
Description:
Petitions for reopening evidence and permission to examine the plaintiff online.
Evidence:
Hence IA 08/2025 is liable to be dismissed. Correspondingly IA 09/2025 is also to be dismissed.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Power of Attorney
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Executed on 05.12.2023 by the plaintiff in favour of Haridas T.R. to represent her in court.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type:
Promissory Note
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Witnessed by the Power of Attorney and mentioned as part of the transaction.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type:
Cheque
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Referenced in the context of the financial transaction related to the case.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kanjirappally
Common Reasons
Case Code
O.S
Case Code Year
2018