Case Summary
Ushakumari.R. filed a petition to restore a previous petition that was dismissed due to non-compliance with court orders. The respondent did not file any objections.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Rent Case
Final Judgment
No
The petition filed by Ushakumari.R. to restore the prior petition was dismissed as no valid reasons were provided.
Key Reasoning:
The court found that the petitioner did not comply with the previous orders to rectify service issues.
The court found that the petitioner did not comply with the previous orders to rectify service issues.
Why Defendant Won:
The court found that the petitioner did not comply with the previous orders to rectify service issues.
The court found that the petitioner did not comply with the previous orders to rectify service issues.
Supporting Evidence
the petitioner has not explained in this application the reason for complying the order of the court to take steps against the respondent in correct address.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, the petition is dismissed. No costs.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Ushakumari.R.
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Al-Ameer
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- P.Sankara Pillai
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Maranad G.Krishna Kumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Refused
Description:
The petition to restore BRC (OP) No. 11/22 on file.
Evidence:
Therefore, it can be concluded that there is no reason stated in the accompanying affidavit to restore the RC (OP) 11/22 on file. Hence the petition is liable to be dismissed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Rent Case
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
RP.NO.
Case Code Year
2023