Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 160/2024

Case between Union Bank of India vs Satheesh Kumar V. M et al regarding mediation settlement

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Judge
SMT. REEJA R. NAIR.
Order Date
2025-07-14
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Union Bank of India filed a suit against Satheesh Kumar V. M and Jiji O. S regarding a mediation settlement. The parties entered into a compromise voluntarily and the court accepted the mediation report.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court accepted the mediation report where both parties voluntarily entered into a compromise. The suit is decreed in accordance with the mediation terms.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court accepted the mediation report where both parties voluntarily entered into a compromise. The suit is decreed in accordance with the mediation terms.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The mediation report was found lawful and not opposed to public policy.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The mediation report was found lawful and not opposed to public policy.
Supporting Evidence
The parties entered into compromise voluntarily and signed by both parties.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence mediation report is accepted. Suit is decreed in terms of mediation report.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Union Bank of India
Relation
represented by its branch Manager and principal officer, Vinu Paul
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Satheesh Kumar V. M
Party Age
48
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Jiji O. S
Party Age
46
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Mediation report
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Vino Jose
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Adarsh Dharmajan
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
M. Jacob
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
I.C. Anitha
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The suit is decreed in terms of the mediation report.
Evidence:
Hence mediation report is accepted. Suit is decreed in terms of mediation report.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Mediation Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
The court accepted the mediation report, noting it was lawful and not opposed to public policy.
Reference:

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Settlement and Mediation
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Union Bank of India vs Satheesh Kumar V. M et al regarding mediation settlement
Case Code Year
Case between Union Bank of India vs Satheesh Kumar V. M et al regarding mediation settlement

Case Flags

Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Tue, 07/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Thu, 07/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India vs Sarun.M.A et al regarding mediation settlement
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Bank of Baroda vs Wilson Xavier regarding mediation settlement
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Bank of Baroda, Vazhakkala Branch vs Pushpa P regarding Suit for realization of money
Court of Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Bank of Baroda vs Kulsum Boutique and Beauty Parlour et al regarding Money Realisation
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between IDBI Bank Limited vs Ashraya Kerala JLG Unit et al regarding realization of money
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won