Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No. 160/2024

Case between Union Bank of India vs Satheesh Kumar V. M et al regarding mediation settlement

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Judge
SMT. REEJA R. NAIR.
Order Date
2025-07-14
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Union Bank of India filed a suit against Satheesh Kumar V. M and Jiji O. S regarding a mediation settlement. The parties entered into a compromise voluntarily and the court accepted the mediation report.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court accepted the mediation report where both parties voluntarily entered into a compromise. The suit is decreed in accordance with the mediation terms.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The mediation report was found lawful and not opposed to public policy.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence mediation report is accepted. Suit is decreed in terms of mediation report.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Union Bank of India (Age not specified years) Poonithura Branch, Door No.29, 2826A, Aditya Gandhi Square, Poonithura P.O, Ernakulam, Pin:-682 038

Defendants

Satheesh Kumar V. M (48 years) Palakkal Parambu, T. K. S. Road, Maradu P.O, Ernakulam, Pin:-682 304 Jiji O. S (46 years) Odukkathara House, Poonithura Post, Ernakulam, Pin:-682 038

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The suit is decreed in terms of the mediation report.
Evidence:
Hence mediation report is accepted. Suit is decreed in terms of mediation report.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Mediation Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
The court accepted the mediation report, noting it was lawful and not opposed to public policy.
Reference:

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases