Case Summary
The petitioners, T.V. Abraham and Mariyamma Abraham, filed for a temporary prohibitory injunction against the respondents, Ajitha, Prasanth, and Omana. The court found that the plaintiffs have a prima facie case and that refusing the injunction may cause irreparable injury to them.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Temporary prohibitory injunction restraining respondents from making constructions obstructing the ingress and egress of plaintiff.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court granted the plaintiffs a temporary prohibitory injunction to prevent the defendants from making constructions that would obstruct the plaintiffs' access to a specified item of property.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Plaintiffs have a prima facie case and balance of convenience is in their favour.
Plaintiffs have a prima facie case and balance of convenience is in their favour.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Plaintiffs have a prima facie case and balance of convenience is in their favour.
Plaintiffs have a prima facie case and balance of convenience is in their favour.
Supporting Evidence
From the records on file, the court is satisfied that plaintiff has a primafacie case and balance of convenience is in his favour.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence respondents are restrained from reducing the width of plaint schedule item No. 3 by making constructions including any portion of plaint schedule item No. 3, putting up gate in any portion of plaint schedule item No. 3 obstructing the ingress and egress of plaintiff through plaint schedule item No. 3 and committing any waste therein until further orders.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- T.V. Abraham
- Party Age
- 63
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Mariyamma Abraham
- Party Age
- 60
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Ajitha
- Party Age
- 65
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Prasanth
- Party Age
- 25
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Omana
- Party Age
- 65
- Relation
- D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- K.S Sajikumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Girish S. Nair
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- D. Biju
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Injunction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
temporary prohibitory injunction
Evidence:
the court is satisfied that plaintiff has a primafacie case and balance of convenience is in his favour.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kanjirappally
Common Reasons
Case Code
O.S
Case Code Year
2025