Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S 57/2023

Case between T.S. Salim vs Binu Sebastian regarding a monetary claim

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Judge
Smitha Susan Mathew
Order Date
2025-01-16
Duration
Case Code No.
57
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff T.S. Salim has filed a claim against the defendant Binu Sebastian for a monetary amount related to fixed deposits. The court has examined the evidence and the amount involved.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court vacated the attachment ordered previously, allowing the plaintiff's fixed deposit receipts to be kept in safe custody.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court vacated the attachment ordered previously, allowing the plaintiff's fixed deposit receipts to be kept in safe custody.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The maturity amount of the fixed deposit receipts is sufficient to satisfy the claim amount.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The maturity amount of both receipts would amount to ₹ 9 ½ lakhs. Prima facie the amount is sufficient to satisfy the claim amount.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence the attachment ordered on 15.02.2023 in I.A 2/2023 is vacated.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
T.S. Salim
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Binu Sebastian
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Fixed deposit receipts surrendered by the plaintiff
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Alex J. Edackattu
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Muhammed Haris K.S.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The attachment ordered on 15.02.2023 in I.A 2/2023 is vacated.
Evidence:
Hence the attachment ordered on 15.02.2023 in I.A 2/2023 is vacated.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Fixed Deposit Receipts
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The plaintiff surrendered two fixed deposit receipts, which are sufficient to satisfy the claim amount.
Reference:

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kanjirappally
Common Reasons
Case Code
O.S
Case Code Year
2023

Quick Facts

Location
Kanjirappally
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kanjirappally
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 02/28/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Abraham Mathew et al vs Suresh Raman et al regarding suit dismissal
Court of the Munsiff, Kanjirappally
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Union Bank of India vs Dhanya S., Silamban M. et al regarding non-payment of court fee.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Anilkumar vs Chirakkadavu Grama Panchayath regarding withdrawal of suit.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Joseph Antony et al vs C. M. M Educational and Charitable Trust regarding Interlocutory Application
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Anilkumar vs Chirakkadavu Grama Panchayat regarding withdrawal of suit.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won