Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
R.C.P. No.122/2024

Case between T.O.Xavier et al vs Ismail.P regarding defaulted rent payments

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
SMT. REEJA R. NAIR
Order Date
2025-02-28
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The petitioners, T.O.Xavier and Molly Xavier, are landlords seeking possession of a building from the respondent, Ismail.P, due to unpaid rent. The respondent defaulted on rent payments, accumulating significant arrears and failing to respond to legal notices.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the petition, directing the respondent to vacate the premises within 30 days and awarded costs to the petitioners.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Respondent directed to vacate the building within 30 days
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioners' evidence of unpaid rent and the respondent's failure to present a defense supported their claim.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, The petition is allowed u/s 11(2)(b) and 12(3) of the Act with costs as follows:- 1. The respondent/tenant is directed to put the landlord/petitioners in possession of the petition schedule building within 30 days from today.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

T.O.Xavier (75 years) 10 B, Purava Oceana Marive Drive, Kochi-18, Ernakulam Molly Xavier (68 years) 10 B, Purava Oceana Marive Drive, Kochi-18, Ernakulam

Defendants

Ismail.P (51 years) No.1/72, Payyampally, Chakkad P.O., Pin- 670 703, Kannur District having office at Volga Computers Academy, 64/243, Lisie Hospital Road, Thelekadan Arcade, Kochi-682018

Reliefs

Relief Type: Possession
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The respondent/tenant is directed to put the petitioners in possession of the petition schedule building.
Evidence:
The petition is allowed u/s 11(2)(b) and 12(3) of the Act with costs...
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Relief No.2 sought for is beyond the jurisdiction of this rent control court.
Evidence:
Since relief No.2 sought for is beyond the jurisdiction of this rent control court, it is declined.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: License Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Establishes the terms of the lease agreement between the petitioners and the respondent.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Legal Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Serves as evidence of communication regarding the default in rent payments.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Returned Postal envelope
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Demonstrates the unsuccessful attempt to deliver the legal notice to the respondent.
Reference:
Ext.A3

Quick Facts

Location
ERNAKULAM
Case Filed
Fri, 09/01/2023 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases