Case Summary
The suit for partition was decreed in terms of compromise as allowed by I.A.1299/2016.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Partition decree as per compromise
Case Type
Partition Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit for partition was decreed in terms of the compromise.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The suit was decreed in terms of the compromise as allowed by I.A.1299/2016.
The suit was decreed in terms of the compromise as allowed by I.A.1299/2016.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The suit was decreed in terms of the compromise as allowed by I.A.1299/2016.
The suit was decreed in terms of the compromise as allowed by I.A.1299/2016.
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Suit decreed in terms of compromise since I.A.1299/2016 is allowed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Thithikutty(Died).
- Relation
- W/o Muhammed Haji
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Fathimmakutty
- Party Age
- 65
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Kunhipathutty
- Party Age
- 60
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Nafeesa
- Party Age
- 58
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Biriyakutty
- Party Age
- 48
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Beerankutty
- Party Age
- 62
- Relation
- S/o Muhammed kutty Haji
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Avarankutty
- Party Age
- 56
- Relation
- S/o Muhammedkutty Haji
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Kunhimuhammed
- Party Age
- 52
- Relation
- S/o Muhammedkutty Haji
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Musthafa
- Party Age
- 45
- Relation
- S/o Muhammedkutty Haji
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Ramla
- Party Age
- 41
- Relation
- W/o Abu @ Aboobacker
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Adil Risafi
- Party Age
- 25
- Relation
- S/o Abu @ Aboobacker
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Adnan
- Party Age
- 17
- Relation
- S/o Abu @ Aboobacker
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Adira Rusani
- Party Age
- 13
- Relation
- D/o Abu @ Aboobacker
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. M.A. Ismail
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Smt. Sreekala Sudheesh
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Partition
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Partition decree as per compromise
Evidence:
Suit decreed in terms of compromise since I.A.1299/2016 is allowed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Partition Suit
Category
Family Property and Partition
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Partition Suit
Case Code
Case between Thithikutty et al vs Beerankutty et al regarding partition
Case Code Year
Case between Thithikutty et al vs Beerankutty et al regarding partition