Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
Original Suit No. 49 OF 2016

Case between Raveendra Nath et al vs Padmini regarding partition

Court
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Judge
Smt. VINCY.T.V.
Order Date
2016-11-22
Duration
Not mentioned
Case Closed
Tue, 11/22/2016 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Plaintiffs sought partition of property jointly owned with the defendant. Court decreed preliminary partition of the property into two equal shares.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed preliminary partition of the property between the plaintiff and the defendant.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Preliminary decree for partition
Case Type
Partition Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed preliminary partition of the property between the plaintiff and the defendant.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is decreed and preliminary decree for partition is passed as follows:- Plaint schedule property shall be divided in to two equal shares by metes and bounds...

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Raveendra Nath
Relation
Son of Kalingal Velayudhan
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Janaki
Party Age
58
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Anupama
Party Age
17
Relation
Minor
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Padmini
Party Age
69
Relation
Wife of Cheraya Parambil Sahadevan
Plaintiffs Documents
Genealogical table, Document No. 1810/1968 etc.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Reliefs

Relief Type: Partition
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Decreed preliminary partition of the property into two equal shares.
Evidence:
Suit for partition... Preliminary decree for partition is passed as follows:- Plaint schedule property shall be divided in to two equal shares by metes and bounds...

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Genealogical table
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Showing relationship between plaintiff and defendant.
Reference:
As per suit
Document Type: Partition Deed
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Evidence of distribution of property amongst family members.
Reference:
Document No. 1810/1968

Case Classification

Case Type
Partition Suit
Category
Family Property and Partition
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Partition of jointly owned property
Case Code
Case between Raveendra Nath et al vs Padmini regarding partition
Case Code Year
Case between Raveendra Nath et al vs Padmini regarding partition

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Tue, 11/22/2016 - 12:00
Case Closed
Tue, 11/22/2016 - 12:00
From
Tue, 11/01/2016 - 12:00
To
Wed, 11/30/2016 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Paruthikkunnan Moideenkutty vs Paruthikunnan Hassan's Children et al regarding partition
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Partition Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunhammu vs Alungal Muhammad's Children et al regarding partition
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Partition Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Thithikutty et al vs Beerankutty et al regarding partition
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Partition Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Chekkidinte Purakkal Ramlath vs Chekkidinte Purakkal Khalid's children regarding partition
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Partition Suit Defendant Won
Case between Poozhithara Hajira vs Thazhathepeediyekkal Kunhimuhammed's son: P.P. Hamzakkutty regarding partition
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Partition Suit Defendant Won