Original Suit No. 405 OF 2014

Case between Chekkidinte Purakkal Ramlath vs Chekkidinte Purakkal Khalid's children regarding partition

Court

Court of the Munsiff of Tirur

Judge

Smt. Vincy.T.V.

Order Date

2016-09-22

Duration

2 years

Case Closed

Thu, 09/22/2016 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Plaintiff filed a suit for partition against defendants, but suit was dismissed as it was not pressed.

Judgment Outcome

Judgment Favored

Defendant

Relief Granted

Not Applicable

Case Type

Partition Suit

Final Judgment

The suit for partition was dismissed as it was not pressed by the plaintiff.

Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned

Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned

Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Suit for Partition. Hearing advanced as per order in I.A.1852/2016. Heard. Suit is not pressed and statement also filed. Hence suit is dismissed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Chekkidinte Purakkal Ramlath
Party Age: 38
Relation: Daughter of

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Usman
Party Age: 55
Relation: Child of Chekkidinte Purakkal Khalid

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Aboobacker
Party Age: 53
Relation: Child of Chekkidinte Purakkal Khalid

Plaintiffs Documents

Not mentioned

Defendants Documents

Not mentioned

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Sri.K.P. Khaleel Ibrahim
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Smt.T. Jasleena
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Sri. S. Hariharan
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Sri.M.K. Moosakutty
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Partition

Outcome: Not Decided

Description:

Plaintiff sought partition of property

Evidence:

Suit is not pressed and statement also filed. Hence suit is dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification