Case Summary
Ramankutty filed a suit against Kudukkil Chanthu's Children seeking partition, but the suit was dismissed for default as the plaintiff was absent.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Unknown
Case Type
Partition Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit for partition was dismissed as the plaintiff was absent, and costs were awarded to the defendants.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Suit is dismissed for default with costs to the defendants
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Ramankutty
- Party Age
- 75
- Relation
- S/o. Kudukkil Chanthu
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Koru
- Party Age
- 66
- Relation
- Child of Kudukkil Chanthu
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Aramughan
- Party Age
- 63
- Relation
- Child of Kudukkil Chanthu
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. K. Mehroof Shihab
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. P. Santhosh Kumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Dinesh Pookkayil
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Unknown
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
Evidence:
Suit is dismissed for default with costs to the defendants
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Partition Suit
Category
Family Property and Partition
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Partition Dispute
Case Code
Case between Ramankutty vs Kudukkil Chanthu's Children regarding partition
Case Code Year
Case between Ramankutty vs Kudukkil Chanthu's Children regarding partition