Case Summary
The plaintiffs include Thankamani, Shyni, and Renjisha. The case was dismissed for default as the plaintiffs were not present and not represented.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiffs' absence.
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiffs were not present for the hearing.
Plaintiffs were not present for the hearing.
Why Defendant Won:
Plaintiffs were not present for the hearing.
Plaintiffs were not present for the hearing.
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff not present. Not represented.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence suit dismissed for default. Pronounced in open court on this the 11th day of september 2025.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Thankamani
- Party Age
- 55
- Relation
- W/o Late Mohanan
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Shyni
- Party Age
- 34
- Relation
- W/o Shaiju
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Renjisha
- Party Age
- 30
- Relation
- W/o Renjith
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Vishvanathan
- Party Age
- 74
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Kabil Chandran T
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Binil Bhasi
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- D.Subhashchandran
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
The suit was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff not being present.
Evidence:
Plaintiff not present. Not represented. Defendant present. Plaintiff not ready for evidence. Hence suit dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Vaikom
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS
Case Code Year
2022