Case Summary
Tessy Riena Poonattu and Jojo Kurivilla are the parties involved in this case. The court allowed a compromise petition which led to the suit being decreed.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Refund Court Fee as per rules.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court approved the compromise petition and decreed the suit in terms of the compromise.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The terms of the compromise are lawful.
The terms of the compromise are lawful.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The terms of the compromise are lawful.
The terms of the compromise are lawful.
Supporting Evidence
Terms are lawful.
Judgment Evidence:
Compromise petition is allowed. Compromise is recorded. Suit is decreed in terms of compromise.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Tessy Riena Poonattu
- Party Age
- 43
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Jojo Kurivilla
- Party Age
- 53
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Compromise petition 3/25.
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sijo Joseph
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Jusitn David.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Compromise is recorded. Suit is decreed in terms of compromise.
Evidence:
Compromise petition is allowed. Compromise is recorded. Suit is decreed in terms of compromise.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kanjirappally
Common Reasons
Case Code
O.S
Case Code Year
2021