Case Summary
The petitioners, T K Nazar, Fousiya, and Sajid, have brought a Rent Control Petition against the counter petitioner Pookunju. The matter was settled and therefore the petition was dismissed as not pressed.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court found that the matter had been settled between the parties. As a result, the Rent Control Petition was dismissed.
Key Reasoning:
The petitioners did not pursue the matter further as it was settled.
The petitioners did not pursue the matter further as it was settled.
Why Defendant Won:
The petitioners did not pursue the matter further as it was settled.
The petitioners did not pursue the matter further as it was settled.
Supporting Evidence
The court accepted that the matter was settled and not pursued.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence RCP is dismissed as not pressed. RCP dismissed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- T K Nazar
- Party Age
- 56
- Relation
- S/o late K P Abooty
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Fousiya
- Party Age
- 47
- Relation
- D/o late K P Abooty
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sajid
- Party Age
- 45
- Relation
- S/o late K P Abooty
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Pookunju
- Party Age
- 60
- Relation
- S/o Aboobakker
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Shyni Gopi
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- M J Joseph Mannarath
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between T K Nazar et al vs Pookunju regarding Rent Control Petition
Case Code Year
Case between T K Nazar et al vs Pookunju regarding Rent Control Petition