Case Summary
Sulatha Mathew, the petitioner, filed a rent control petition against M/s Asianet Digital Network Private Company Ltd., the respondent. The case was dismissed as not pressed.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The petition was dismissed as not pressed.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
RCP dismissed as not pressed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sulatha Mathew
- Party Age
- 64
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- M/s Asianet Digital Network Private Company Ltd.
- Relation
- represented by
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Joseph Abraham
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Rohit C Oommen
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
RCP dismissed as not pressed.
Evidence:
RCP dismissed as not pressed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Sulatha Mathew vs M/s Asianet Digital Network Private Company Ltd. regarding rent control petition.
Case Code Year
Case between Sulatha Mathew vs M/s Asianet Digital Network Private Company Ltd. regarding rent control petition.