Case Summary
The petitioners, Sulatha Mathew and Arun Itty Mathew, are seeking to evict the respondent, M/s Asianet Digital Net Work Private Company Ltd. The court dismissed the petition as not pressed.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the rent control petition as it was not pressed by the petitioners.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Hence RCP is dismissed as not pressed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sulatha Mathew
- Party Age
- 64
- Relation
- W/o late Mathew Itty
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Arun Itty Mathew
- Party Age
- 41
- Relation
- S/o late Mathew Itty
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- M/s Asianet Digital Net Work Private Company Ltd.
- Relation
- Represented by its Managing Director
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Joseph Abraham
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Arun S Nair
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Rohit C Oommen
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
RCP is dismissed as not pressed.
Evidence:
Hence RCP is dismissed as not pressed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Sulatha Mathew et al vs M/s Asianet Digital Net Work Private Company Ltd. regarding Rent Control Petition
Case Code Year
Case between Sulatha Mathew et al vs M/s Asianet Digital Net Work Private Company Ltd. regarding Rent Control Petition