R.C.P. No. 34/2023

Case between Seena Davis @ Seena Sabu vs Dr. Anju J Prakash regarding Rent Control Petition

Court

THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER

Judge

SMT. REEJA R. NAIR.

Order Date

2025-01-16

Duration

Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Seena Davis filed a rent control petition against Dr. Anju J Prakash regarding tenancy issues. The court heard the petition and allowed the associated interim application.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won

Interim Order

The application under Section 12 (3) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act was allowed. The rent control petition was subsequently closed.

Judgment Favored

Plaintiff

Relief Granted

Case Type

Rent Control Petition

Final Judgment

The application under Section 12 (3) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act was allowed. The rent control petition was subsequently closed.

Why Plaintiff Won:

Losing Side's Weaknesses:

Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

IA 06/2025 is allowed (VSO). Rent control petition is closed according stopping further proceedings.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Seena Davis @ Seena Sabu
Party Age: 54
Relation: W/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Dr. Anju J Prakash
Party Age: 30
Relation: D/o

Plaintiffs Documents

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: N.S. Ajay
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Babu Kuttan K.C.
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Varghesekutty K.P.
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Neeraj T.N.
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Jaya D.
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Sanu S. Malakeel
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other

Outcome: Granted

Description:

IA 06/2025 is allowed and the rent control petition is closed.

Evidence: