Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S 198/2022

Case between Suvals S. vs Pushpa Jebi et al regarding attachment of property.

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Judge
Smitha Susan Mathew
Order Date
2025-05-22
Duration
Case Code No.
198
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Suvals S., a Deputy Vice President of Federal Bank Ltd., filed a petition against Pushpa Jebi and Usha Bhaskaran regarding an attachment of property ordered due to a mortgage dispute. The petitioner argues that the attachment should be vacated as it affects the bank's rights over a secured asset.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The petition is allowed and the attachment order is vacated.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The petition is allowed and the attachment order is vacated.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The attachment was determined to be subsequent to the mortgage, thus entitling the petitioner to vacate it.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The attachment was determined to be subsequent to the mortgage, thus entitling the petitioner to vacate it.
Supporting Evidence
The attachment ordered in IA No.2/2022 on 22.07.2024 is to be vacated, and the petition is allowable. The 2nd defendant is entitled to proceed under SARFAESI Act.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the petition is allowed. The attachment ordered in IA No.2/2022 on 13.07.2022 is vacated.

Parties Involved

Parties

Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
George Kurian
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Mohammed Haris K.S.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sabitha G.
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Majesh P.B.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The petition is allowed. The attachment ordered in IA No.2/2022 on 13.07.2022 is vacated.
Evidence:
In the result, the petition is allowed. The attachment ordered in IA No.2/2022 on 13.07.2022 is vacated.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kanjirappally
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
O.S
Case Code Year
2022

Quick Facts

Location
Kanjirappally
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kanjirappally
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Thu, 05/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 06/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Canara Bank vs Ann Mariya Jose et al regarding dismissal of suit
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Union Bank of India vs George Sebastian regarding mediation settlement
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Union Bank of India vs Fazil Y. Salim et al regarding service of process
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Aby Jose vs The Canara Bank regarding dismissal for default
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Union Bank of India vs Dhanya S., Silamban M. et al regarding non-payment of court fee.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Civil Suit Defendant Won