Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 1195/2018

Case between Sunny Mathew vs Girly Johney regarding declaration and injunction

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Nanda Krishna M.
Order Date
2025-03-17
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Sunny Mathew, the plaintiff, seeks a declaration of possessory title and an injunction to prevent Girly Johney, the defendant, from interfering with his possession of the property. The plaintiff claims that the defendant has threatened to encroach on the property.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit is decreed in part, with the defendant being restrained from trespassing upon the plaint A schedule property, maintaining the plaintiff’s possession.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendant is restrained from trespassing upon plaint A schedule property.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit is decreed in part, with the defendant being restrained from trespassing upon the plaint A schedule property, maintaining the plaintiff’s possession.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff is in settled possession of the property, and the defendant has no claim of rights over it.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff is in settled possession of the property, and the defendant has no claim of rights over it.
Supporting Evidence
The report filed by the advocate commissioner makes it clear that plaint A schedule property is well-demarcated and the defendant has not claimed any right of possession over plaint A schedule property.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed in part as follows; 1. Defendant is restrained from trespassing upon plaint A schedule property in any way disturbing the plaintiff’s possession and enjoyment of plaint A schedule property.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sunny Mathew
Party Age
62
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Girly Johney
Party Age
65
Plaintiffs Documents
Certified copy of document no. 272/1984, Sale deed no. 4166/2011, Tax receipt issued by the Mulavukad, Village Office.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Joby Jacob Pulickekudy
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Dajish John
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Harikrishnan P
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Pooja Sebastian
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
K.Manu Raj
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff sought a permanent prohibitory injunction to prevent the defendant from interfering with the property.
Evidence:
Thus, the plaintiff has every right to enjoy plaint A schedule property without any kind of obstruction from the side of the defendant who has no claim over the same.
Relief Type: Declaration
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Plaintiff sought a declaration of possessory title for the plaint A schedule property.
Evidence:
Thus, in so far as the relief of declaration of possessory title is concerned, the plaintiff who has no claim of adverse possession which crystallises his possession over plaint A schedule property to that of a title, cannot be said to be entitled for a relief of declaration.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of the document establishing the plaintiff's prior ownership of the property.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document supporting the plaintiff's claim of possession over the plaint A schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Commissioner Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Report by the advocate commissioner regarding the boundaries of the plaint A schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.C1
Document Type: Sketch
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Rough sketch produced along with the advocate commissioner's report.
Reference:
Ext.C1(a)

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Property and Possession Disputes
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Sunny Mathew vs Girly Johney regarding declaration and injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Sunny Mathew vs Girly Johney regarding declaration and injunction

Quick Facts

Location
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sat, 03/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 03/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Mini Jolly vs Noel et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction and mandatory injunction.
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Jobin Thomas vs Thrikkakara Municipality et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between His Holiness Shrimad Raghavendra Thirtha Swami et al vs Venkatesh Shenoy et al regarding declaration and permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Santhosh P @ Santhoshkumar vs Suresh P.S, Mallika Shanmughan regarding fixation of boundary and permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kochuthressia Thomas vs Gopalan, Kalidasan regarding recovery of possession and injunction.
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Defendant Won