Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 23 OF 2019

Case between Sunil vs Rajagopalan regarding Realisation of Money.

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Judge
Sri. Jankish Narayanan
Order Date
2019-10-31
Duration
Case Closed
Thu, 10/31/2019 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Sunil is the plaintiff who lent money to his friend Rajagopalan, the defendant. The defendant failed to repay the borrowed amount as agreed, leading to this suit for recovery.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit directing the defendant to pay the plaintiff the due amount along with interest. The plaintiff is also entitled to recover the costs of the suit.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The defendant is directed to pay an amount of 9,17,950 (Rupees Nine Lakh Seventeen Thousand Nine Hundred and Fifty only) with interest @ 12% per annum from the date of suit till realization.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit directing the defendant to pay the plaintiff the due amount along with interest. The plaintiff is also entitled to recover the costs of the suit.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff proved his case by adducing cogent and reliable evidence.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff proved his case by adducing cogent and reliable evidence.
Supporting Evidence
Since the defendant remained ex parte, the evidence adduced by the plaintiff remained unchallenged. I find no reason to disbelieve PW1. Therefore, I am satisfied that the plaintiff has proved his case by adducing cogent and reliable evidence.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows. 1.The defendant is directed to pay an amount of 9,17,950 (Rupees Nine Lakh Seventeen Thousand Nine Hundred and Fifty only) with interest @ 12% per annum thereon from the date of suit till realization, to the plaintiff.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sunil
Party Age
36
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Rajagopalan
Party Age
52
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Exbt. A1 is marked on the side of the plaintiff.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.Vivek P.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendant is directed to pay an amount of 9,17,950/- with interest.
Evidence:
the defendant is directed to pay an amount of 9,17,950/- (Rupees Nine Lakh Seventeen Thousand Nine Hundred and Fifty only) with interest @ 12% per annum thereon from the date of suit till realization, to the plaintiff.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to realize the costs of the suit from the defendants.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is entitled to realize the costs of the suit from the defendants.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This agreement dated 17.06.2017 was executed regarding the repayment of the borrowed amount.
Reference:
Ext.A1

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between Sunil vs Rajagopalan regarding Realisation of Money.
Case Code Year
Case between Sunil vs Rajagopalan regarding Realisation of Money.

Quick Facts

Location
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Mon, 04/10/2017 - 12:00
Case Closed
Thu, 10/31/2019 - 12:00
From
Tue, 10/01/2019 - 12:00
To
Thu, 10/31/2019 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Vijaya Bank, Tirur Branch, Rep. By Its Branch Manager vs Jayaprakash.M.C. et al regarding realisation of money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Vijaya Bank vs Prakashini regarding money.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Vijaya Bank, Tirur Branch. vs Unnikrishnan.M., Geetha.K. regarding money.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between K. Sethumadahavan vs K.P. Chandran regarding realisation of money.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Prestige Enterprises et al vs Reneesh K.V. regarding a money suit
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won