R.C.P. No. 42/2023

Case between Sudheesh.S vs Dr. Benoy Mathew regarding Rent Control

Court

COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER

Judge

SMT. REEJA R. NAIR

Order Date

2024-08-16

Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)

Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Sudheesh.S filed a rent control petition against Dr. Benoy Mathew. The petitioner has been continuously absent for several hearings.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won

Interim Order

The rent control petition was dismissed for default due to the petitioner's continuous absence. This was pronounced in open court.

Judgment Favored

Defendant

Relief Granted

Case Type

Rent Control

Final Judgment

Key Reasoning:
The petitioner did not appear despite being given specific postings for appearance.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, considering the order dated 09.08.2024 and also due to continuous non representation of the petitioner, Rent control petition is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Sudheesh.S (31 years) Brawny Brute Beauty Clinic and Health Studio, Building No.XVI/3268, XVI/3269, Valiyakulangara Building, Opp. CESZ, Kakkanad, Kochi632034

Defendants

Dr. Benoy Mathew (56 years) Valiyakulangara House, Muvattupuzha P.O, Ernakulam District, Pin Code 686661

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other

Outcome: Dismissed

Description:

Rent control petition dismissed for default due to continuous non-representation of the petitioner.

Evidence:

the petitioner is continuously absent for the last several postings. Hence, considering the order dated 09.08.2024 and also due to continuous non representation of the petitioner, Rent control petition is dismissed for default.