Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
R.C.P. No. 42/2023

Case between Sudheesh.S vs Dr. Benoy Mathew regarding Rent Control

Court
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
SMT. REEJA R. NAIR
Order Date
2024-08-16
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Sudheesh.S filed a rent control petition against Dr. Benoy Mathew. The petitioner has been continuously absent for several hearings.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The rent control petition was dismissed for default due to the petitioner's continuous absence. This was pronounced in open court.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Rent Control
Final Judgment
No
The rent control petition was dismissed for default due to the petitioner's continuous absence. This was pronounced in open court.
Key Reasoning:
The petitioner did not appear despite being given specific postings for appearance.
Why Defendant Won:
The petitioner did not appear despite being given specific postings for appearance.
Supporting Evidence
The petitioner is continuously absent for the last several postings.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, considering the order dated 09.08.2024 and also due to continuous non representation of the petitioner, Rent control petition is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sudheesh.S
Party Age
31
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Dr. Benoy Mathew
Party Age
56
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Malini Rao
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Kailas Nath
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
P.M. Manesh
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Swetha P.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Dileep
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Dona K.R.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Peeyus A. Kottam
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Rent control petition dismissed for default due to continuous non-representation of the petitioner.
Evidence:
the petitioner is continuously absent for the last several postings. Hence, considering the order dated 09.08.2024 and also due to continuous non representation of the petitioner, Rent control petition is dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Rent Control
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Sudheesh.S vs Dr. Benoy Mathew regarding Rent Control
Case Code Year
Case between Sudheesh.S vs Dr. Benoy Mathew regarding Rent Control

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Thu, 08/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Sat, 08/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Thykoodam Edavaka Cristeeya Sangam vs Anta Builders and Developers Private Limited regarding Rent Control
THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Rent Control Plaintiff Won
Case between Suresh P., Subhadra Thampuran vs Zachariah Thomas T. regarding Rent Control
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Rent Control Defendant Won
Case between Antony Jain M.C. vs Mini Baby regarding Rent Control
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Rent Control Plaintiff Won
Case between V.K. Raveendran vs Soumya Shyam regarding Rent Control
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Rent Control Defendant Won
Case between V.K. Raveendran vs Soumya Shyam regarding Rent Control
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Rent Control Plaintiff Won