Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
MC No. 15/2025

Case between State vs Sukhilesh et al regarding bail conditions and penalties.

Court
Court of Judicial Magistrate of the First Class-II, Nadapuram
Judge
Sri. Yadukrishnan B.
Order Date
2025-12-16
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves the State as the petitioner against the counter petitioners Sukhilesh and Nidhin regarding the violation of bail conditions by an accused. The accused failed to appear in court, leading to the forfeiture of the bail and penalties for the sureties.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court directed the counter petitioners to pay a penalty of Rs.5,000/- each due to their failure to ensure the presence of the accused. Additionally, a distress warrant was issued to collect the penalty if not paid within one month.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Penalty of Rs.5,000/- each to be paid by counter petitioners.
Case Type
MC
Final Judgment
No
The court directed the counter petitioners to pay a penalty of Rs.5,000/- each due to their failure to ensure the presence of the accused. Additionally, a distress warrant was issued to collect the penalty if not paid within one month.
Key Reasoning:
Counter petitioners are ordered to pay penalties due to non-compliance with court directives.
Why Defendant Won:
Counter petitioners are ordered to pay penalties due to non-compliance with court directives.
Supporting Evidence
Considering the facts and circumstances, I am of the view that a reasonable amount can ordered to be paid as penalty and the rest could be remitted.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, 1) The counter petitioners are directed to pay penalty of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand Only) each under section 491 BNSS.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
State
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sukhilesh.
Party Age
29
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Nidhin P. K.
Party Age
27
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The counter petitioners are directed to pay penalty of Rs.5,000/- each under section 491 BNSS.
Evidence:
Considering the facts and circumstances, I am of the view that a reasonable amount can ordered to be paid as penalty and the rest could be remitted.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Issue Distress Warrant to collect the amount under section 461 (1)(b) of BNSS, if the penalty is not paid within one month.
Evidence:
Issue Distress Warrant to collect the amount under section 461 (1)(b) of BNSS, if the penalty is not paid within one month.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
If the warrant could not be executed, the counter petitioners are liable to undergo simple imprisonment for 10 days in Civil Prison.
Evidence:
If the warrant could not be executed, the counter petitioners are liable to undergo simple imprisonment for 10 days in Civil Prison.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
MC
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Common Reasons
Violation of bail conditions
Case Code
Case between State vs Sukhilesh et al regarding bail conditions and penalties.
Case Code Year
Case between State vs Sukhilesh et al regarding bail conditions and penalties.

Case Flags

Imprisonment Involved
Imprisonment Duration
10 days

Quick Facts

Location
Nadapuram
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Mon, 09/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

State

Similar Cases

Case between State vs Babu K. P. et al regarding violation of bail conditions
COURT OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF THE FIRST CLASS-II
MC Defendant Won
Case between State vs Rashid V. V. et al regarding bail violation
COURT OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF THE FIRST CLASS-II, NADAPURAM
MC Plaintiff Won
Case between State vs Babu K. P. et al regarding violation of bail conditions
COURT OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF THE FIRST CLASS-II, NADAPURAM
MC Plaintiff Won
Case between State of Kerala vs Arifa regarding closed MC
COURT OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE FIRST CLASS-II
MC Unknown
Case between State of Kerala vs Santhosh, Nidhin regarding penalty payment
COURT OF JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE-II, NADAPURAM
MC Plaintiff Won